Blunt Microdissection of Chronic Total Occlusions

The Frontrunner CTO Catheter facilitates guidewire placement across coronary and peripheral CTOs

By Matt Selmon, MD
 

To view the tables related to this article, please refer to the print version of our October issue, page 38.

Stenotic lesions in both the coronary and peripheral vasculature are routinely treated with an effective array of minimally invasive percutaneous techniques, including balloon angioplasty (PTCA) and stenting.1-3 With a guidewire placed across a target lesion, these proven catheter-based techniques work well, and excellent revascularization is typically achieved.4-7 The availability of drug-eluting stents is expected to further solidify percutaneous treatment of vascular stenosis as the standard of care in both coronary and peripheral vascular disease.8-10 In the case of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), however, conventional guidewires cannot be consistently and reliably placed across the lesion. It is currently estimated that CTOs are present in up to one third of patients with coronary disease diagnosed by angiography, and they remain the primary reason for surgical referral. When percutaneous intervention is attempted in these patients, inability to place a guidewire across the occlusion is the leading cause of failure.11
CTOs are typically composed of a hard fibrotic and sometimes calcified proximal cap. This cap is followed by a segment of poorly organized fibrous and calcified plaque ending with a firm distal cap. These mature lesions are commonly located in tortuous areas of the vasculature that have varying degrees of vascular wall remodeling. CTOs are invariably refractory to crossing with conventional floppy guidewires because of the fact that insufficient axial force can be applied to achieve reliable advancement. The use of stiffer and more aggressive hydrophilic guidewires is often also insufficient and suffers from an attendant increase in risk of perforation.

Novel catheter technology has recently been developed that allows for facilitated recanalization of many previously intractable CTOs through a process of “blunt microdissection.”12 The Frontrunner X39 CTO Catheter (LuMend, Inc., Redwood City, CA) (Figure 1) is a third-generation, single-use, disposable, 3.1-F catheter consisting of an articulating, distal tip assembly manually actuated by means of a proximal rocker handle.

The Frontrunner X39 CTO Catheter is most commonly used in combination with the Frontrunner Micro Guide Catheter (MGC). The MGC provides additional support for the X39 when needed, and acts as a conduit for a more rapid wire exchange after the X39 has crossed the CTO. The system is specifically designed for facilitating placement of conventional guidewires safely across CTOs in both the coronary and peripheral vasculature by steering the distal tip of the device to the occlusion site, and then remotely actuating the tip to facilitate blunt microdissection of the plaque (Figure 2). The distal assembly of the Frontrunner can be cycled repeatedly as required in various planes to microdissect and separate tissue in the target vessel segment. In this way, the technique provides a space for crossing and advancing guidewires beyond the CTO.

Originally designed for use in coronary arteries, the Frontrunner CTO Catheter has been increasingly used to facilitate guidewire placement across peripheral CTOs. Atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease is the leading cause of occlusive disease of the extremities. The primary sites of involvement are the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries (30% of symptomatic patients), the femoral and popliteal arteries (80% to 90% of patients), and the more distal vessels, including the tibial and peroneal arteries (40% to 50% of patients).13

RESULTS

Various versions of the Frontrunner device have now been documented in more than 1,000 procedures in both peripheral and cardiovascular applications. Data have been collected using the current version of the device, the X39 in combination with the MGC, in almost 300 cases. With success defined as placement of a guidewire across the CTO lesion, the X39 (0.039-inch diameter) and MGC have been successfully used in 38 of 41 peripheral procedures (iliac, subclavian, and SFA arteries) for a 93% success rate (Table 1). The same combination of Frontrunner and MGC has been successful in 150 of 244 (62%) of coronary procedures (Table 2).

Initial peripheral vasculature experience to date appears to be relatively insensitive to CTO location. Coronary success rates, however, are somewhat variable depending on location, ranging from a low of 57% in the RCA to a high of 70% in the left coronary anatomy. This variability in the coronaries is thought to be primarily due to vessel tortuosity and the right coronary artery’s size and predisposition to dissection. Generally, higher success rates in the periphery may be due to straighter, less complex vessel anatomy. Success rates in both peripheral and coronary applications appear to be relatively insensitive to lesion length (Tables 3 and 4).

Blunt microdissection of CTOs with the Frontrunner catheter has also demonstrated a significant reduction in crossing times versus conventional guidewires. Approximately 30% of all coronary cases and 50% of all peripheral cases are crossed in less than 10 minutes with the Frontrunner device. Furthermore, 70% of both coronary and peripheral cases are crossed in less than 20 minutes.

Failure modes can be summarized into six categories: (1) subintimal advancement with inability to re-enter the true lumen; (2) failure to engage the lesion; (3) failure to dissect through the lesion after successful engagement; (4) Frontrunner-related complication; (5) procedure-related complication; or (6) other (Table 5).

Subsequent to successful guidewire placement, an average of two stents per patient are placed in both coronary and peripheral vessels. An analysis of stents currently being placed is shown in Table 6. This distribution is likely to change as drug-eluting products become more readily available. Nonetheless, it is encouraging to see complete revascularization achieved in patients who would otherwise be referred to surgery or be relegated to medical therapy.

SUMMARY

The use of a blunt microdissection technique to safely fracture and separate stenotic material and form a pathway through CTOs for the purpose of placing conventional guidewires and subsequent PTCA and stent therapy is proving to be a very safe and effective method of treating these previously recalcitrant lesions. The blunt distal tip of the LuMend Frontrunner device appears to significantly reduce the risk of perforation. The optional use of the recently developed Micro Guide Catheter provides additional support for the Frontrunner X39 CTO Catheter, further enhancing its effectiveness. Successful minimally invasive treatment of peripheral and coronary CTOs clearly benefits patients who have historically required referral to surgery. 

Matt Selmon, MD, is an attending interventional cardiologist at Sequoia Hospital, Redwood City, California. He is a co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of LuMend, Inc. Dr. Selmon may be reached at (650) 306-2300; mselmon@cvmed.org.

1. Leertouwer TC, Gussenhoven EJ, Bosch JL, et al. Stent placement for renal arterial stenosis: where do we stand? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2000;216:78-85.
2. Bosch JL, Tetteroo E, Mali WPTM, et al. Iliac arterial occlusive disease: cost-effectiveness analysis of stent placement versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. Radiology. 1998;208:641-648.
3. Bosch JL, Hunink MG. Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease [published correction appears in Radiology. 1997;205:584]. Radiology. 1997;204:87-96.
4. Mercado N, Boersma E, Wijns W, et al. Clinical and quantitative coronary angiographic predictors of coronary restenosis: a comparative analysis from the balloon-to-stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:645-652.
5. Zhu MM, Feit A, Chadow H, et al. Primary stent implantation compared with primary balloon angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:297-301.
6. Kastrati A, Schomig A, et al. Predictive factors of restenosis after coronary stent placement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1428-1436.
7. Mehran R, Dangas G, Elezi S, et al. Treatment of focal in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty alone versus stenting: short- and long-term results. Am Heart J. 2001;141:610-614.
8. Duda SH, Poerner TC, Wiesibger B, et al. Drug-eluting stents: potential applications for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;14:291-301.
9. Hiatt BL, Carter AJ, Yeung AC. The drug-eluting stent: is it the Holy Grail? Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2001;2:190-196.
10. Colombo A, Orlic D, Stankovic G. Preliminary observations regarding angiographic pattern of restenosis after rapamycin-eluting stent implantation. Circulation. 2003;107:2178-2180. Online publication date: April 28, 2003.
11. Olivari Z, Rubartelli P, Piscione F, et al. Immediate results and one-year clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary interventions in chronic total occlusions: data from a multicenter, prospective, observational study (TOAST-GISE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1672-1678.
12. Bonnier H. A novel guidance system for the crossing of total occlusions. Presented at the American College of Cardiology annual meeting; March 28, 2000, Anaheim, CA.
13. Fuster V, Alexander RW, O’Rouke RA, Eds. Hurst’s: The Heart, 10th edition. McGraw-Hill: 2001; p. 2471.

 

Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney
484-581-1816
cmcchesney@bmctoday.com

Stephen Hoerst
484-581-1817
shoerst@bmctoday.com

Charles Philip
484-581-1873
cphillip@bmctoday.com

About Endovascular Today

Endovascular Today is a publication dedicated to bringing you comprehensive coverage of all the latest technology, techniques, and developments in the endovascular field. Our Editorial Advisory Board is composed of the top endovascular specialists, including interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, neurologists, and vascular medicine practitioners, and our publication is read by an audience of more than 22,000 members of the endovascular community.