Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Experience on Outcomes in AAA Repair Studied

 

August 23, 2017—In Journal of Vascular Surgery (JVS), Andrew J. Meltzer, MD, et al published findings from a study that aimed to assess the impact of the surgeon's and hospital's experience on the outcomes of open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of intact and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in New York State (2017;66:728–734).

The study demonstrated that for intact AAAs, the surgeon's volume was an important factor for OSR outcomes, whereas low facility volume was associated with worse outcomes after EVAR. For ruptured AAAs, low-volume surgeons and facilities had worse outcomes after OSR but not after EVAR.

As summarized in JVS, the investigators used New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data to identify patients undergoing AAA repair from 2000 to 2011. Characteristics of the provider and hospital were determined by linkage to the New York Office of Professions and National Provider Identification databases.

Distinct hierarchical logistic regression models for EVAR and OSR for intact and ruptured AAAs were created to adjust for the patient's comorbidities and to evaluate the impact of the surgeon's and hospital's experience on outcomes. The provider's years since medical school graduation, as well as annual volume of the facility and provider, are examined in tertiles.

The investigators reported that a total of 18,842 patients underwent AAA repair by a vascular surgeon. For intact AAAs (n = 17,118), 26.2% of patients underwent OSR and 73.8% underwent EVAR. For ruptured AAAs (n = 1724), 63.9% underwent OSR and 36.1% underwent EVAR.

After intact AAA repair, OSR adjusted outcomes were significantly influenced by the surgeon's annual volume but not by the facility's volume or the surgeon's age.

The lowest volume providers (1–4 OSRs) had higher in-hospital mortality rates than high-volume (> 11 OSRs) surgeons (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–3.17). Low-volume providers also had higher rates of major complications (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1–1.51).

For patients with intact AAAs undergoing EVAR, mortality was higher at low-volume facilities performing < 33 EVARs (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3–5.3) and 34 to 81 EVARs (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5–4.8).

After OSR for ruptured AAAs, treatment at a low-volume facility (< 9 OSRs for ruptured AAAs) was associated with greater mortality than at high-volume (> 27 OSRs for ruptured AAAs) centers (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.02–2.39), whereas low-volume physicians (< 4 OSRs for ruptured AAAs) had higher rates of major complications (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.04–2.41).

In the case of EVAR for ruptured AAAs, there were no characteristics of the hospital or surgeon that were significantly associated with worse outcomes.

The interaction between the surgeon's and the hospital's volume is complex and varies on the basis of the acuity of presentation and treatment modality, concluded the investigators in JVS.

 

Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney
484-581-1816
cmcchesney@bmctoday.com

Stephen Hoerst
484-581-1817
shoerst@bmctoday.com

Charles Philip
484-581-1873
cphillip@bmctoday.com

About Endovascular Today

Endovascular Today is a publication dedicated to bringing you comprehensive coverage of all the latest technology, techniques, and developments in the endovascular field. Our Editorial Advisory Board is composed of the top endovascular specialists, including interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, neurologists, and vascular medicine practitioners, and our publication is read by an audience of more than 22,000 members of the endovascular community.