Sponsored by Biotronik

Combining a Drug-Coated Balloon and a Bare-Metal Stent: The REsponse Adapted Combination Therapy (REACT) Strategy

Allowing vessel response to guide appropriate treatment for SFA disease.

By Koen Deloose, MD, and B. Patrice Mwipatayi, MD, MMed, MClinEd, FCS, FRACS

Infrainguinal peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects more than 200 million people worldwide. This number will increase in the future with greater prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors and aging populations.1

The femoropopliteal segment is probably the most challenging area in the endovascular treatment field. Frequently, bone-like calcified plaque burden that is exposed to numerous internal and external mechanical stressors such as flexion, extension, elongation, compression, and external compression make this particular artery difficult to treat.2

Figure 1. The restenotic cascade following vessel injury.


It is widely accepted that a durable solution for superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease requires blocking of the restenotic cascade (Figure 1), which extends up to 18 months in PAD (in contrast to the 6 months in the coronary arteries) using antiproliferative agents such as paclitaxel.3-5 Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) seem to be the ideal carriers.

Current results examining the effects of DESs are more than acceptable. The Zilver PTX (Cook Medical) showed a primary patency rate of 84.4% (vs 68% in the group for optimal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty [PTA] with or without bailout stenting as needed) and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate of 91.6% (vs 80% in the optimal PTA with or without stent group). Even at 5 years, the Zilver PTX demonstrates a 41% reduction in restenosis and a 48% reduction in reintervention compared to standard care.6

Likewise, the Eluvia DES (Boston Scientific Corporation), although in a smaller number of patients, has an impressive patency rate of 96.4% at 1 year and a freedom from TLR rate of 85.3% at 3 years.7

After a period of time, the drug dissipates, and only the metal stent remains. Although this is not problematic in short lesions, the efficacy of nitinol stents in longer lesions decreases with increased lesion length because of the length of the metallic implant and associated potential complications (eg, physical irritation, fractures, restenosis). Additionally, stenting of longer lesions results in greater interference with the femoropopliteal geometry and imposes a mechanical burden that leads to chronic mechanical stress.

For these reasons, interventionalists favor the use of DCBs in a strategy of leaving nothing behind. Without a permanent scaffold, the natural vessel motion is not “caged,” preserving the viability of future endovascular and surgical intervention options and reducing the length of time for which dual antiplatelet therapy is required.

Evidence for improved patency rates and freedom from TLR has been provided both in pivotal DCB trials in ideal situations8-14 and in registries of more daily practice patient cohorts, which is a more important outcome for patients and health care providers.15

Although evidence suggests that the performance of DCBs is independent of lesion complexity, there continues to be a bailout stent ratio > 40% in long lesions (> 20 cm), severely calcified lesions, and a high number of chronic total occlusions.15-17 In arteries that are obstructed by overwhelming atherosclerotic plaque deposition, balloon angioplasty increases the vessel lumen through uncontrolled dissection, resulting in longitudinal tears and creating tissue flaps with varying degrees of severity. Additional data also suggest that untreated dissections following plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), including non–flow-limiting dissections, are associated with reduced patency.18


Although the leave-nothing-behind strategy appears attractive, it is only feasible in a controlled, straightforward “pivotal trial” scenario. In real-world scenarios for an endovascular interventionalist, an “As Less as Reasonably Achievable” strategy (ALARAS) seems a more appropriate daily principle to adhere to.19 This strategy maintains the natural motion of the femoropopliteal artery by placing scaffolding only where needed. A cyclical bending-torsion-elongation movement in this arterial segment applies tremendous biomechanical stress to implants in general. It is logically acceptable that long stents will fracture under this stress, while with ALARAS, the long nonstented segments of the vessel wall are probably compensating for some of these forces with focal scaffolds.20

The combination of DCBs and the modern generation of nitinol stents works well. Early trials including DEBATE SFA21 and RAPID22 clearly demonstrated the safety and efficacy of this therapy. In the single-center DEBATE SFA study, the added value of the combination of the In.Pact Admiral balloon (Medtronic) and the Maris SX stent (Medtronic) in comparison with the Maris SX alone was statistically significant. The primary endpoint, 12-month binary restenosis, occurred in nine (17%) versus 26 (47.3%) of lesions in the DCB plus bare-metal stent group and standard balloon plus bare-metal stent group, respectively (P = .008). The multicenter randomized RAPID trial improved the performance of the Supera stent (Abbott Vascular) by adding the Legflow DCB (Cardionovum).

The DEBAS study was a prospective study performed at three hospitals in Perth, Australia.23 The Pulsar-18/35 self-expanding stent (Biotronik) and Passeo-18 Lux DCB (Biotronik) were used to treat severe and complex femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease. The treatment rationale was that in complex Trans-Atlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions, angioplasty alone would damage the intima, causing flow-limiting dissections that often required stent implantation. Stent placement in long lesions has been associated with high restenosis rates. However, inflating a DCB* within the stent may help to ensure that the barotrauma is evenly spread across the stented length without substantially impeding drug transfer. The rationale for the use of thin-strut stents was that they decrease the distance between the DCB and the vessel wall owing to the low metal-to-artery ratio (Figure 2), and it may also be true that when the space left between struts is larger, more drug can go through. This geometric principle of thin struts reducing distance between drug coating and wall is independent of stent type or stent material. In the DEBAS study, we investigated when the DCB is inflated within the stent,* the scoring effect can cause plaque surface modification and may allow enhanced paclitaxel transfer, especially in calcified lesions.

Figure 2. Combined thin strut and narrow width showing that the smallest section of vessel wall around the stent struts receives no direct paclitaxel (PTX) (A). Thinner and narrower struts provide a larger area for PTX contact with the vessel wall (B).

The DEBAS study included 51 limbs from 44 patients between October 2007 and April 2010. The mean age of the patients was 67.6 years, and 72.7% were men. Chronic PAD severity was classified as Rutherford class 3 in 41.2%, class 4 in 31.4%, and class 5 in 27.4% of limbs. The most common preexisting risk factors were hypertension (70.4%), hyperlipidemia (52.3%), diabetes mellitus (54.6%), and smoking (38.6%). Of note, 16% of the treated lesions were in popliteal arteries, and the lesions were predominantly TASC D (51%) and C (45.1%), with 32 (62.7%) chronic total occlusions. All lesions were treated successfully. The mean lesion length was 200 ± 74.55 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 167.09–208.01 mm) with a mean number of stents per limb of 1.57 ± 0.7 (95% CI, 1.37–1.76). Distal embolization occurred in two patients. The primary patency rates at the 12- and 24-month follow-up were 94.1% (95% CI, 82.9%–98.1%) and 88.2% (95% CI, 75.7%–94.5%), respectively. The assisted primary patency was 94.1% (95% CI, 82.9%–98.1%), and secondary patency was 96.1% (95% CI, 85.2%–99%) at 24-month follow-up. The freedom from clinically driven TLR rate was 94.1% (95% CI, 82.9% – 98.1%) at 12-month follow-up and 88.2% (95% CI, 75.7%–94.5%) at 24-month follow-up, with two patients requiring a bypass graft. The freedom from TLR rate was similar in longer and shorter lesions: 93.7% (95% CI, 63.2%–99.1%) for lesions shorter than 120 mm versus 85.7% (95% CI, 69%–93.8%) for lesions longer than 120 mm at 24-month follow-up. The stent fracture rate at 12-month follow-up was only 2%, and the cumulative stent fracture rate at the 24-month follow-up was 9.8% (but it was only in one case that stent frature was associated with an impact on the clinical outcome).23

The BIOLUX 4EVER trial offers another good example of this “combination” concept. This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized study enrolled 120 patients in five Belgian centers. Predilatation with the Passeo-18 Lux drug-releasing balloon (Biotronik) followed by implantation of the Pulsar-18 stent (Biotronik) was performed. Approximately 20% of the enrolled patients were diabetic. The mean lesion length was 83.3 mm, and 33% were occlusions. The primary patency rate at 12-month follow-up was 89.9%, and the freedom from TLR at 1 year was 93.6%. Preliminary results at 2-year follow-up were presented at Charing Cross this year and showed a primary patency rate of 83.5% and freedom from TLR rate of 86.1%.24

When numerically comparing the results from DEBAS with those of the BIOLUX 4EVER and 4EVER trials25—where only the same self-expanding Pulsar 18 stent was used—improved primary patency (by 13% and 8%, respectively) was observed, with sustained benefits at 24 months (by 11%), suggesting a trend for positive effect of paclitaxel from the use of Passeo-18 Lux (Figure 3).

Figure 3. The 2-year patency results of the BIOLUX 4EVER study compared with those in the 4EVER data.


The strategy of the BIOLUX 4EVER trial (in contrast with the DEBAS approach), where dilatation of the lesion is initially performed by a DCB, followed by scaffolding with a bare-metal stent, allows implementation of the ALARAS principle. This is the basis for REsponse Adapted Combination Therapy (REACT): after extensive vessel preparation (POBA, debulking, etc), the lesion is dilated with a DCB, and a scaffolding stent is implanted when necessary.

Unfortunately, the previous “when necessary” description remains a major unsolved challenge. To optimally apply the ALARAS principle and the REACT strategy, it is necessary to clearly identify when and where, as well as which scaffold is indicated. Angiographic images, even with additional projections, are sometimes insufficient to clearly determine if a dissection needs a scaffold. Currently, there is no angiographic definition or validated method for grading of dissection in the peripheral arteries. Although it has been widely used, the classification developed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to grade coronary artery dissection as A to F based on angiographic appearance is often difficult to extrapolate to peripheral arteries.26 Fujihara et al tried to create a modified version, but it was artificial, subjective, and based on a single angiographic anteroposterior view.27 Evaluation of additional values using several adjunctive procedural assessments with standard angiography is required (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Grading A to F dissections in the SFA, where A to C seem to be minor flow-limiting dissections, and D to F are serious flow-limiting dissections. Reprinted with permission from Fujihara M, Takahara M, Sasaki S, et al. Angiographic dissection patterns and patency outcomes after balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:367-375.27

At present, adequate flow dynamic and functional measurement guidelines are lacking.

The classic, easy, and inexpensive duplex ultrasound technique can be used intraoperatively as an adjunctive method to angiographically identify dissections, flow patterns, systolic velocities, and complications.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography use either a transducer or a fiber attached to a catheter to generate ultrasound waves or infrared light, respectively, and produce a 360° cross-sectional view of the vessel. They can be performed during the procedure for morphologic assessment adjunctive to angiography and intra-arterial pressure measurement to identify dissections. Of course, these techniques require experience and dedicated protocols, and criteria need to be developed for peripheral applications.

Another potential assessment method is intra-arterial pressure (gradient) measurement using a pressure guidewire. After calibration, the pressure wire is positioned distally with respect to the most distal angioplasty area and then slowly pulled back to the more proximal position. In addition, measurements in the proximal pre-angioplasty area are performed. Thus, it is feasible to determine the mean pressure gradient, defined as the difference between the mean pressure in the healthy area distal to the lesion and the mean proximal pre-lesion pressure.

Although there is a lack of experience in peripheral arteries, this technique is of great help in guiding the operator through definitive treatments in the coronary arteries.

Economic drawbacks will probably limit widespread use of these technologies, but more insights and potential correlations with other, less costly methods could be offered in study settings.

To address the above issues, a global, multicenter, prospective pilot study, the BIOTRONIK REACT trial, was developed. The purpose of the study is to examine the incremental value of several procedural assessments adjunctive to standard angiography for use in identifying flow-limiting dissection and residual stenosis, and to better inform the operator about the stent requirement. In addition, the study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of the REACT algorithm with the Passeo-18 Lux DCB and Pulsar-18 self-expanding stent for the treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions in the superficial femoral and/or proximal popliteal arteries.

The following techniques will be evaluated: procedural duplex ultrasound and intra-arterial pressure measurement alone or in combination with IVUS.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of intraprocedural duplex ultrasound added to angiography. As a secondary diagnostic endpoint, the performance of intra-arterial pressure measurement, with or without IVUS, will be assessed for sensitivity and specificity for translesion pressure gradients, peripheral fractional flow reserve, dissection characteristics, and new categorization of peripheral dissections.

Additionally, procedural endpoints will be measured using the REACT approach: technical success rates, stent length, and the ability to reduce the length and number of stents (ALARAS), using additional diagnostic tools.


The REACT trial aims at refining ALARAS in the treatment of challenging SFA disease by blocking the prolonged restenotic cascade, avoiding the use of nonfunctional metal implants, and appropriately applying scaffolds based on objective, flow dynamic criteria, while being guided by vessel response.

1. Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;382:1329-1340.

2. Neil N. Stent fracture in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries: literature summary and economic impacts. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2013;25:20-27.

3. Kastrati A, Schömig A, Dietz R, et al. Time course of restenosis during the first year after emergency coronary stenting. Circulation. 1993;87:1498-1505.

4. Schillinger M, Sabeti S, Dick P, et al. Sustained benefit at 2 years of primary femoropopliteal stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with optional stenting. Circulation. 2007;115:2745-2749.

5. Iida O, Uematsu M, Soga Y, et al. Timing of the restenosis following nitinol stenting in the superficial femoral artery and the factors associated with early and late restenoses. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:611–617.

6. Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, et al. Durable clinical effectiveness with paclitaxel-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery: 5-year results of the Zilver PTX randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1472-1483.

7. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Keirse K, Zeller T, et al. Long-term results from the MAJESTIC trial of the Eluvia paclitaxel-eluting stent for femoropopliteal treatment: 3-year follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40:1832-1838.

8. Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and/or popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. 2014;131:495-502.

9. Laird JR, Schneider PA, Tepe G, et al. Durability of treatment effect using a drug-coated balloon for femoropopliteal lesions: 24-month results of IN.PACT SFA. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2329-2338.

10. Rosenfield K, Jaff MR, White CJ, et al. Trial of a paclitaxel-coated balloon for femoropopliteal artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:145-153.

11. Schroeder H, Meyer DR, Lux B. Two-year results of a low-dose drug-coated balloon for revascularization of the femoropopliteal artery: outcomes from the ILLUMENATE first-in-human study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:278-286.

12. Schroeder H, Werner M, Meyer DR, et al. Low-dose paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease: 1-year results of the ILLUMENATE European randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2017;135:2227-2236.

13. Krishnan P, Faries P, Niazi K, et al. Stellarex drug-coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal disease: 12-month outcomes from the randomized ILLUMENATE pivotal and pharmacokinetic studies. Circulation. 2017;136:1102-1113.

14. Bausback Y, Willfort-Ehringer A, Sievert H, et al. Six-month results from the initial randomized study of the Ranger paclitaxel-coated balloon in the femoropopliteal segment. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:459-467.

15. Thieme M, Von Bilderling P, Paetzel C, et al. The 24-month results of the Lutonix global SFA registry: worldwide experience with Lutonix drug-coated balloon. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1682-1690.

16. Scheinert D. IN.PACT Global long lesion subanalysis in 157 subjects. Presented at EuroPCR 2015; Paris, France; May 20, 2015.

17. Tepe G. IN.PACT GLOBAL CTO subanalysis. Presented at: Charing Cross; London, United Kingdom; April 26, 2016.

18. Tepe G, Zeller T, Schnorr B, et al. High grade, non-flow limiting dissections do not negatively impact long-term outcome after paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty: an additional analysis from the THUNDER study. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:792-800.

19. Deloose K, Callaert J. Less is more: the "as less as reasonably achievable stenting" (ALARAS) strategy in the femoropopliteal area. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2018;59:495-503.

20. Rocha-Singh K, Jaff M, Crabtree T, et al. Performance goals and endpoint assessments for clinical trials of femoropopliteal bare nitinol stents in patients with symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007;69:910-919.

21. Liistro F, Grotti S, Porto I, et al. Drug-eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for the superficial femoral artery: the DEBATE-SFA randomized trial (drug eluting balloon in peripheral intervention for the superficial femoral artery). JACC. 2013;6:1295-1302.

22. De Boer SW, Van den Heuvel DAF, de Vries-Werson DAB, et al. Short-term results of the RAPID randomized trial of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon with Supera stenting vs Supera stenting alone for the treatment of intermediate and long superficial femoral artery lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:783-792.

23. Mwipatayi BP, Perera K, Daneshmand A, et al. First-in-man experience of self-expanding nitinol stents combined with drug-coated balloon in the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease. Vascular. 2018;26:3-11.

24. Deloose KR, Bosiers M, Callaert J, et al. 24 month results of the BIOLUX 4 EVER trial. Oral presentation Charing Cross, April 2018, London, United Kingdom.

25. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callaert J, et al. 4-French-compatible endovascular material is safe and effective in the treatment of femoropopliteal occlusive disease: results of the 4-EVER trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20:746-756.

26. Rogers J, Lasala J. Coronary artery dissection and perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:493-499.

27. Fujihara M, Takahara M, Sasaki S, et al. Angiographic dissection patterns and patency outcomes after balloon angioplasty for superficial femoral artery disease. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:1-9.

Koen Deloose, MD
Head, Department of Surgery
Head, Vascular Surgery
AZ Sint Blasius
Dendermonde, Belgium
Disclosures: Clinical trial investigator, consultant, and lecturer for Biotronik.

B. Patrice Mwipatayi, MD, MMed, MClinEd, FCS, FRACS
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Australia
Disclosures: Clinical trial investigator, consultant, and lecturer for Biotronik.


Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney

Stephen Hoerst

Charles Philip

About Endovascular Today

Endovascular Today is a publication dedicated to bringing you comprehensive coverage of all the latest technology, techniques, and developments in the endovascular field. Our Editorial Advisory Board is composed of the top endovascular specialists, including interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, neurologists, and vascular medicine practitioners, and our publication is read by an audience of more than 22,000 members of the endovascular community.