Sponsored by Cordis Corporation
S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System: Experience and Outcomes in Two Italian Centers of Excellence
A new-generation stent for the treatment of TASC II C and D lesions of the SFA.
The S.M.A.R.T. Flex Vascular Stent System is available under CE Mark only and is not approved in the United States.
Despite advancements in technology and continually improving results, the management of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the lower extremities remains a significant challenge, from focal occlusions to multilevel critical limb ischemia. To many, the current gold standard treatment for patients with critical limb ischemia, defined as chronic ischemic rest pain, ulcers, or tissue loss, remains infrainguinal bypass.1-4 Surgical revascularization is the treatment of choice for TASC II C and D lesions, and vein bypass remains the treatment against which any infrainguinal arterial reconstruction technique for superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusion should be compared.
Considerable progress has been made in percutaneous endovascular SFA treatment, including the development of subintimal techniques and reentry devices for crossing chronic total occlusions and longer, more flexible nitinol stents. Although vein bypass is the gold standard treatment for TASC II C and D lesions, it is not feasible in all patients because of comorbidities or general contraindications to surgery. As a result, more than 90% of TASC II C and D lesions are treated with an endovascular approach.4-6 Subsequent surgical revascularization of aortoiliac and femoropopliteal chronic total occlusions is often feasible regardless of whether endovascular revascularization is successful.5
SFA STENT PLACEMENT
In the superficial femoral and popliteal segments, the role of primary stent placement remains a topic of research and discussion. The use of self-expanding bare-metal stents has been shown to improve the durability of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) performed on the superficial femoral and popliteal segments in properly selected patients.7
Stents can be placed after unsuccessful PTA and/or treating infrainguinal occlusive disease due to early elastic recoil, residual stenosis, or flow-limiting dissection after PTA.8,9 However, different forces, such as longitudinal stretching, external compression, torsion, and flexion, act on the superficial femoropopliteal artery and may lead to stent fractures and eventually restenosis.
Older trials evaluating the role of stenting in the peripheral arterial circulation were disappointing. One-year primary patency rates were 22% with the PALMAZ® Stent (Cordis Corporation) and 30% with the Wallstent® (Boston Scientific Corporation).10
Today, nitinol self-expanding stents are the most commonly placed stents in patients with femoropopliteal disease. Stent length has been shown to be a major determining factor for long-term primary patency, which explains the high variability of primary patency rates (45.9%–92%).11
S.M.A.R.T.® FLEX VASCULAR STENT SYSTEM
In stented portions of the SFA, increased stress and major deformity have been found, which may lead to alterations (ie, rupture, kinking) in stent material.12 Thus, biomechanics as it relates to fatigue resistance of nitinol stents implanted in the femoropopliteal arteries is an important concern. The daily activity of the hip and knee joint exposes the SFA—and therefore the implanted stents—to cyclic deformations that could influence stent fatigue resistance.13,14 The most important characteristic of a bare-metal stent is fracture resistance.15
The S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System (Cordis Corporation) is a uniquely constructed, fully connected, self-expanding stent made from laser-cut superelastic nitinol tubes. The helical strut bands and the flex bridges are interconnected, which provides strength, flexibility, and durability. The fully connected structure facilitates a continuous but atraumatic synergy between the stent and vessel wall, which also enables axial compliance.
Most femoropopliteal stents have three or four connections around the circumference, whereas the S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System has 13 or 16 connections (depending on the stent diameter) in addition to a fully connected structure, which enhances durability and structural redundancy.
In several vigorous comparative fatigue tests, the S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System demonstrated greater fracture resistance and greater ability to resist compression and maximize luminal diameter, enabling increased blood flow.
Not only is the durability of the stent reflected in its high-cycle fatigue resistance, the stent system design also ensures that the stent is uniformly delivered as intended. During placement, the S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System does not significantly elongate because of a biased axial compliant delivery system. The stent conforms perfectly to the vessel wall, which determines an optimum performance.15-17
Our dual-center experience is a nonconsecutive prospective evaluation of patients who received the S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent Systems at the femoral and popliteal arteries, with a particular focus on cases that involved the “articular” tract of the popliteal artery.
We have treated 50 patients who had a reduced quality of life, as determined by PAD symptoms such as pain during movement, pain at rest, decreased quality and duration of sleep, inability to perform activities of daily living, and loss of independence.
Pretreatment workup imaging demonstrated that 35 patients had chronic total occlusions of the femoropopliteal and trifurcation vessels, classified as TASC II C and D lesions; three patients had associated popliteal artery aneurysms. The regions of stent placement were the proximal SFA, mid-SFA, distal SFA, proximal popliteal artery, and distal popliteal artery with articular involvement.
The technical success rate was 100%. After each device was implanted into the mid-SFA, distal SFA, and the proximal popliteal region, a flexion angiogram was obtained to evaluate whether the stent(s) exhibited kinking or compression. In all patients, the arterial circulation was not compromised by stent kinking or bending either at 90° or in full flexion.
No minor or major intraprocedural complications were observed, no obstructions were observed on day 1 postimplantation, and primary patency was 100% at 1 month postimplantation, as assessed by color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS). A stent occlusion was observed in one patient at 2 months postimplantation, likely due to inadequate therapy compliance by the patient. No stent fractures were observed during this period.
A 76-year-old woman had a long smoking history and a history of cardiomyopathy and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. She had leg pain with claudication in the left leg with a walking distance of 50 meters.
Pretreatment workup was performed, including CT angiography with a three-dimensional volume rendering, which showed a complete occlusion starting at the middle third of the SFA and extending approximately 15 cm (Figure 1A and 1B). The same results were seen on multiplanar reconstructed paracoronal CT.
Intraprocedural SDA showed occlusion of the left SFA to the distal third artery, where a normal lumen could be appreciated near the articular tract of the popliteal artery (Figure 1C). Because of the vascular fibrocalcification, we decided to perform direct stenting in order to avoid distal embolization. Intrastent angioplasty was later performed to bring the vessel close to its initial diameter. Single-shot DSA showed correct stent positioning (Figure 1D). Postprocedural DSA showed correct positioning of the S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System (Figure 1E), which secured arterial blood flow to the limb and restored the correct artery caliber (Figure 1F). Postprocedural CDUS was performed to assure the patency of the popliteal artery in the treated limb (Figure 1G).
PAD is an important clinical problem worldwide. Vein bypass remains the gold standard treatment, but because of individual patient characteristics and comorbidities, there is no single best way to manage PAD. The continuous technologic development of new devices is increasing indications for percutaneous treatment. The S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System can be used to treat patients with extensive disease at the distal periarticular tract and has shown promising results. Further studies involving a larger series of patients are needed to confirm the current results.
Filippo Piacentino, MD, is with the Department of Radiology, University of Insubria School of Medicine in Varese, Italy. He has stated that he has no financial interests related to this article. Dr. Piacentino may be reached at email@example.com.
Enrico Marone, MD, is at the Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita–Salute in Milan, Italy. He has stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
Prof. Patrizio Castelli, MD, FACS, is at the Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Insubria, School of Medicine, Varese, Italy. He has stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
Prof. Gianpaolo Carrafiello, MD, is at the Department of Radiology, University of Insubria, School of Medicine, Varese, Italy. He has stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
Prof. Roberto Chiesa, MD, is at the Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Università Vita–Salute in Milan, Italy. He has stated that he has no financial interests related to this article.
1. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, et al. Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA. 2001;286:1317-1324.
2. Yin MY, Jiang ME, Huang XT, et al. Endovascular interventions for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II C and D femoropopliteal lesions. Chin Med J. 2013;126:415-420.
3. Han DK, Shah TR, Ellozy SH, et al. The success of endovascular therapy for all TransAtlantic Society Consensus graded femoropopliteal lesions. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:15-24.
4. Piacentino F., Duka E., Ierardi A. M. et al. Percutaneous endovascular treatment of long femoro-popliteal arterial occlusion: a review of the literature. It J of Vasc and Endovasc Surg 2014 Sep;21(3):125-38
5. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45 Suppl S:S5-S67.
6. Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Amighi J, et al. Primary patency of femoropopliteal arteries treated with nitinol versus stainless steel self-expanding stents: propensity score-adjusted analysis. Radiology. 2004;232:516-521.
7. Laird JR, Katzen BT, Scheinert D, et al. Nitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:267-276.
8. Ihnat DM, Duong ST, Taylor ZC, et al. Contemporary outcomes after superficial femoral artery angioplasty and stenting: The influence of TASC classification and runoff score. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:967-974.
9. DeRubertis BG, Vouyouka A, Rhee SJ, et al. Percutaneous intervention for infrainguinal occlusive disease in women: Equivalent outcomes despite increased severity of disease compared with men. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:150-158.
10. Dearing DD, Patel KR, Compoginis JM, et al. Primary stenting of the superficial femoral and popliteal artery. J Vasc Surg. 2009;50:542-547.
11. Marmagkiolis K, Hakeem A, Choksi N, et al. 12-month primary patency rates of contemporary endovascular device therapy for femoro-popliteal occlusive disease in 6,024 patients: beyond balloon angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;84:555-564.
12. Müller-Hülsbeck S, Schäfer PJ, Charalambous N, et al. Comparison of second-generation stents for application in the superficial femoral artery: an in vitro evaluation focusing on stent design. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:767-776.
13. Aghel A, Armstrong EJ. Recent advances in self-expanding stents for use in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;12:833-842.
14. Morrison JW, Pelletier MH, Rives A, et al. Corrosion resistance, surface evaluation, and geometric design comparison of five self-expanding nitinol stents used in clinical practice. J Endovasc Ther. 2014;21:230-239.
15. Nikanorov A, Smouse HB, Osman K, et al. Fracture of self-expanding nitinol stents stressed in vitro under simulated intravascular conditions. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:435-440.
16. Schlager O, Dick P, Sabeti S, et al. Long-segment SFA stenting—the dark sides: in-stent restenosis, clinical deterioration, and stent fractures. J Endovasc Ther. 2005;12:676-684.
17. Goverde P, Taeymans K, Lauwers K. Technical considerations and clinical results in treating extensive femoropopliteal occlusive disease. The S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System Solution. Insert to Endovascular Today Europe. 2014;2(5).
For healthcare professionals only. As part of the Cordis policy of continuous product development, we reserve the right to change product specifications without prior notification. Contact your Cordis sales representative for availability and ordering.
Important information: Prior to use, refer to the Instructions for Use supplied with this device for indications, contraindications, side effects, suggested procedure, warnings, and precautions. The third party trademarks used herein are trademarks of their respective owners. The S.M.A.R.T.® Flex Vascular Stent System is available under CE Mark only and is not approved in the United States.