The EVAR Center

Filter Your Results




The Impact of Outcomes

Rodney A. White, MD

August 2006—Rodney A. White, MD, discusses the goals of the SVS Outcomes Committee, issues in reimbursement, and assessments of high-risk patient outcomes data.

Making Sense of Apples-to-Oranges Comparisons

K. Craig Kent, MD

August 2006—K. Craig Kent, MD, describes the advantages and disadvantages of each of the available datasets on endovascular repair in high-risk patients, including what has been learned from the extensive Medicare database.

Issues in Comparative High-Risk Datasets

Roy K. Greenberg, MD

August 2006—Roy K. Greenberg, MD, explains the Cleveland Clinic's experiences with high-risk aneurysm patients, the limitations of current comparative analyses, and the search for predictors of mortality.

Evaluating Outcomes in Context

Robert Zwolak, MD

August 2006—Robert Zwolak, MD, discusses his work with the SVS Outcomes Committee, the role of AHRQ, and his perspective on contemporary endovascular aneurysm trials.

Aptus Endovascular AAA Repair System

Takao Ohki, MD; David H. Deaton, MD; and José Antonio Condado, MD

November 2006—Report of the 1-year follow-up in a first-in-man study.

Long-Term AAA Sac Pressure Monitoring

Takao Ohki, MD, PhD

November 2006—A useful, harmless, and important adjunct to postprocedural surveillance.

Limitations of Implantable Pressure Sensors for EVAR

Geoffrey H. White, MD

November 2006—Before this technology can be widely accepted, issues with respect to reimbursement and efficacy must be addressed.

Fellows Debate: Access for EVAR

Firas F. Mussa, MD; James H. Mitchell, MD; Joseph J. Naoum, MD; Zvonimir Krajcer, MD; and Alan B. Lumsden, MD

November 2006—Percutaneous or femoral artery cutdown? A debate from the multispecialty conference at the Texas Medical Center.




Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney

Stephen Hoerst

Charles Philip

About Endovascular Today

Endovascular Today is a publication dedicated to bringing you comprehensive coverage of all the latest technology, techniques, and developments in the endovascular field. Our Editorial Advisory Board is composed of the top endovascular specialists, including interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, neurologists, and vascular medicine practitioners, and our publication is read by an audience of more than 22,000 members of the endovascular community.