Transcatheter Embolization for Trauma of the Pelvis

Concepts and techniques for a multidisciplinary treatment approach.

By Luke R. Wilkins, MD; Jaime All, MD; and J. Fritz Angle, MD
 

Transcatheter embolotherapy is well established for the management of hemorrhage and vascular injury.1 Familiarity with clinical presentation, pretreatment imaging, angiographic findings, and endovascular techniques are all essential components to effective diagnosis and treatment of trauma patients with embolotherapy. Furthermore, pelvic trauma rarely occurs in isolation; as many as 50% of patients with pelvic fracture have additional injuries, so pelvic fracture should be treated as an indicator of polytrauma.2 As such, an algorithm approach to the care of the trauma patient, though institution dependent, should weigh the severity of multiple injuries and mandates a multidisciplinary approach.

MECHANISM OF INJURY

Pelvic trauma may be categorized into blunt and penetrating, with blunt trauma being more common. When blunt trauma causes a pelvic fracture, vascular injury may be seen in up to 40% of patients. Hemorrhage is the highest cause of mortality in this patient group (50%–74% of patients).3-5

Motor vehicle collisions and pedestrians hit by motor vehicles account for the majority of blunt arterial injury.6 Although domestic falls are a less common cause, the need for pelvic vascular evaluation in this population is well documented.6-8 Further, age is an independent predictor of active bleeding and indication for transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), regardless of hemodynamic stability.6,8 This may be secondary to osteoporosis in elderly women, which results in increased rates of pelvic fracture.9 The prevalence of long-term anticoagulation for cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disease in this patient population may also necessitate early intervention. Types of vascular injury seen with blunt pelvic trauma include complete or partial transection, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, dissection, and traumatic thrombosis.

Examples of penetrating pelvic injuries include gunshot wounds, stab wounds, or iatrogenic injury.10 Penetrating injuries are more likely to result in transection or pseudoaneurysm formation, with or without arteriovenous fistula.11 Traumatic pseudoaneurysms are high risk for rupture and should be treated, preferably with endovascular methods when possible.12

TECHNIQUE

Preprocedural Planning

It is essential that the interventionist be familiar with the trauma history and previous imaging in order to assess the appropriateness and timing of angiography. Indications for TAE in the setting of pelvic trauma include pelvic fractures and hemodynamic instability after exclusion of other sources of hemorrhage, active extravasation of contrast on CTA in the presence of pelvic fracture regardless of hemodynamic status, previous TAE for pelvic trauma with ongoing hemodynamic instability after other sources of hemorrhage have been excluded, and patients older than 60 years with a high-risk pelvic fracture pattern.6,8,13,14 It is important to note that disruption of the osseous pelvis ring allows for a large volume of hemorrhage to accumulate rapidly in a surgically inaccessible area; thus, early intervention is necessary to prevent exsanguination.7 Rapid response is also important: the literature shows a statistically improved survival rate when TAE is performed within 3 hours of arrival to the hospital.15

Whereas TAE plays an important role in the treatment of pelvic trauma, pelvic hemorrhage more commonly occurs from venous sources or fractured cancellous bone, and this type of low-pressure hemorrhage is best controlled with external fixation or compression with pelvic binding. The goal of these methods is to reestablish the normal tamponading effect of the retroperitoneum, although some recent studies call into question the overall efficacy with this approach.2,13,16 Peritoneal pelvic packing has been introduced as an additional method of treating pelvic hemorrhage.2 There are many approaches to this patient population, and interventionists should be familiar with the treatment algorithm employed at their institutions. Regardless, early control of pelvic arterial hemorrhage has a strong association with improved outcomes, and TAE continues to occupy a central role in the treatment of traumatic pelvic hemorrhage.1,13,15,17-20

Site of Access and Diagnostic Imaging

Pelvic binders vary among institutions and can be made of fabric or leather. Depending on the type of material, access may be acquired through a small hole cut into the binder. Otherwise, the binders may have to be undone before obtaining access. Most pelvic embolizations can be performed via a single common femoral artery access site. If there is known unilateral pelvic or lower extremity injury, contralateral femoral access is preferred. If injuries or external devices preclude the preferred femoral access, the procedure can be performed via a brachial or even popliteal or radial artery access. More recently, dual access has been advocated to allow placement of a temporary occlusion balloon within the infrarenal abdominal aorta while pelvic or lower extremity hemorrhage is treated.7,21

The procedure should begin with nonselective angiography to localize sites of hemorrhage and serve as a roadmap for vessel selection. Additionally, the initial imaging is useful in differentiating traumatic injury from guidewire-induced vasospasm.

Appropriate angiographic imaging of the internal iliac artery requires orthogonal selective views. The anterior division is best imaged with a contralateral oblique view of approximately 45°. An ipsilateral anterior oblique view is important to identify the superior gluteal artery and the internal pudendal artery. Although initial nonselective pelvic angiography is an important part of pelvic or extremity evaluation, selective angiography is also critical to achieving appropriate angiographic sensitivity.

Hemorrhage from pelvic trauma is most often associated with the internal iliac artery, but some have advocated that a selective angiogram of the external iliac artery should also be obtained.22 Although the external iliac artery is not usually a source of pelvic hemorrhage, the external pudendal, deep iliac circumflex, inferior epigastric, and circumflex femoral arteries may be injured.1,18,23 The more inferior lumbar arteries, as well as the inferior mesenteric or even the gonadal arteries, are other rare sources of pelvic bleeding.

After completion of contralateral pelvic vessel evaluation, selection of the ipsilateral common iliac artery should be performed. Of note, imaging of the bilateral iliac vessels should always be obtained to avoid continued hemorrhage resulting from reperfusion of the injured vessel via anastomoses with the contralateral pelvic arteries. It also rules out additional injury, which may have been occult on initial CT imaging.

Imaging Appearance

The different angiographic appearances of traumatic vascular injury are listed in Table 1.1,12,16,24 Vascular injury typically occurs in relationship to adjacent osseous fractures or shearing forces against the ligamentous structures of the pelvis.16 Historically, fracture patterns were believed to be important diagnostic indicators in pelvic trauma.4,16 More recent studies have shown that arterial hemorrhage can occur with any of the fracture patterns, as well as in the less severe subtypes, and may occur in the absence of fracture.25 Vertical shear, type II and III lateral compressions, and anterior-posterior compressions are the most concerning fracture patterns for associated vascular injury.4,16,26 It is important that the interventionist recognize these patterns, as they may suggest the culprit vessel in the absence of active extravasation at angiography (Figure 1).

Embolic Material

Embolic material used in trauma is most commonly coils, microcoils, or gelfoam (Pfizer Inc.). Large vessel occlusion devices, such as the Amplatzer vascular plug 4 (St. Jude Medical, Inc.), have seen increasing usage. Alternatively, liquid embolic agents, such as Onyx (Covidien) and N-butyl cyanoacrylate (Codman Neuro [Johnson & Johnson]), have been used, with the potential advantages of achieving vessel occlusion in patients with coagulopathy while providing distal control.27,28 Important considerations when using liquid embolic agents include cost, a steep learning curve, and a narrow safety profile. Small particles, including gelfoam particles, have little or no role in the treatment of acute trauma.12,16

Embolic Delivery

The type of embolic and the site and method of delivery of an embolic agent should be dictated on the basis of angiographic findings of vessel injury. In most cases, superselective embolization at the site of injury is recommended. However, nonselective internal iliac embolization is recommended by some if the patient is hemodynamically unstable or if there are multiple sites of extravasation identified. CT demonstrating acute hemorrhage without active extravasation at angiography may lead the interventionist to nonselectively embolize either the anterior or posterior division of the internal iliac artery.

Gelfoam is an inexpensive temporary embolic agent allowing for potential recanalization within a few weeks. This may allow for reclaimed tissue perfusion once the acute injury has had time to heal. Gelfoam is typically delivered as a slurry mixed in a three-way stopcock with a half-strength mixture of contrast and normal saline. More agitation will create a gelfoam mixture that is smoother and can affect vessels of smaller caliber. If the target of embolization with gelfoam is distal, the gelfoam mixture should be kept coarse to achieve hemostasis through occlusion proximal to the end capillary bed, thereby decreasing the risk of tissue necrosis.13,29 Gelfoam can also be delivered in the form of 2- to 3-mm pledgets. This is performed by front-loading a 2- to 3-mm piece of gelfoam into the tip of a 1-mL syringe of half-strength contrast. The torpedoes may be soaked in contrast before injection. This can be used to achieve occlusion of larger-caliber vessels and may reduce the risk of ischemia. The delivery of gelfoam should be followed with a contrast injection after every few 0.1 to 0.3 mL of slurry or after every few torpedoes with the goal of sluggish flow.12,30 This technique helps limit reflux of embolic agents into other branches.

The administration of gelfoam into internal iliac artery branches is frequently followed by selective branch occlusion with coils (Figure 2). This method prevents very early recanalization of the vessel but is not proximal enough to cause ischemia. Caution is advised, as coils may block access to bleeding vessels if repeat embolization is needed. Coil selection is often dictated by catheter choice. If a 4- or 5-F catheter has been advanced to the target vessel, then 0.035-inch coils, such as Nester or Tornado (Cook Medical), can be used. These 0.035-inch coils have Dacron fibers to promote thrombogenesis. The 0.035-inch coils should be pushed and not injected. Superselective catheterization of the target vessel is typically accomplished with a 0.021-inch lumen, 3-F microcatheter (eg, Cantata [Cook Medical]). A high-flow microcatheter—which typically has a 0.025-inch lumen, such as the Progreat Omega (Terumo Interventional Systems)—provides the ability to perform rapid-power injection. The larger inner lumen of high-flow microcatheters introduces concerns with 0.018-inch microcoil (eg, Nester or Tornado) compatibility because coils can fold over and become wedged within these larger-lumen microcatheters.

Microcoils can be deployed conventionally by using a pushing wire, such as the Trupush (Cordis Corporation). Alternatively, microcoils can also be injected; this may expedite the procedure, but the safety of this technique requires a stable delivery location (ie, not close to the origin of the vessel) and low risk of refluxing gelfoam.

The proximity of the microcatheter to the vessel origin influences the choice of embolization materials. If the catheter is near the origin of the accessed vessel, detachable coils (eg, the Axium Concerto coil [Covidien]), although often more expensive, may be considered to help prevent herniation of the coil into the parent vessel.

Attempts should always be made to advance the microcatheter distal to the site of injury (Figure 1). This allows for coils to be first deployed distal to the injury, followed by gelfoam, and then additional coils proximally (gelfoam sandwich technique). Gelfoam— or in very select circumstances, glue or Onyx—and proximal coils without distal coiling may be used if the lesion cannot be crossed. If a traumatic pseudoaneurysm begins expanding subsequent to proximal coiling, endovascular treatment options are limited to percutaneous embolization of the additional branches that are backfilling the pseudoaneurysm. Coils should not be used directly within a traumatic pseudoaneurysm sac due to the potential for rupture as well as re-expansion.12 However, if the anatomy of the pseudoaneurysm allows, coiling may be performed across the neck of a pseudoaneurysm.

Traumatic arteriovenous fistula may occur when a vein and artery are injured simultaneously, either in the pelvis or extremities. Angiographically, this is appreciated as abnormal early venous return concurrent with the opacification of the arteries. Treatment is similar to pseudoaneurysms, with distal and proximal coil embolization of the artery, but rarely, treatment may require access through both the arterial and venous systems. Although coils may be used in this situation, there is a risk of coil migration in the venous system and subsequent migration centrally. Other options include exclusion of the fistulous connection with an arterial stent graft or use of an Amplatzer vascular plug.31 The Amplatzer plug can be particularly useful for the treatment of arteriovenous fistula because of its low risk of migration.

POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS

Repeat bleeding after pelvic TAE should be considered the most important adverse event, as it occurs in 15% to 20% of patients and is associated with mortality increasing from 15% to 30%.17 Predictors of recurrent pelvic arterial hemorrhage include hemoglobin < 7.5 mg/dL before the procedure, > 6 units of packed red blood cells after the procedure, or a superselective embolization.17 Injured vessels may be in vasospasm or otherwise go undetected during angiography. These missed arterial injuries can manifest as delayed hemorrhage after resuscitation restores intravascular volume. Vasospasm or delayed migration/packing of gelfoam may also contribute to repeat bleeding. Aggressive embolization of occluded vessels (which may be due to traumatic thrombosis or vasospasm) is recommended. Leaving the vascular sheath in place should also be considered when there is concern that the embolization is incomplete or the patient still needs resuscitation.

Directly related to embolization is tissue ischemia within the treatment vascular bed or other territories secondary to nontarget embolization. This uncommon complication is manifest in pelvic embolizations as gluteal muscle necrosis, sacral skin breakdown, ischemic necrosis of the bladder wall and rectum, or necrosis of the femoral head.23,29,32-34 The choice of embolic agent is the best predictor of tissue ischemia. The agent should be small enough to effectively occlude the site of bleeding but large enough to avoid the capillary bed. As mentioned, the use of nonpermanent embolic agents (gelfoam) may potentially aid in reducing the risk of tissue necrosis.

Nerve injury after TAE for trauma has been reported, but shear injury from the trauma itself, rather than procedure- related ischemic changes, may account for many of these reported pelvic TAE complications.23 Impotence in the male patient is likewise usually considered a consequence of the initial traumatic injury rather than nerve injury caused by pelvic TAE.35,36

Nontarget embolization most often occurs when the rate of embolization is too fast and embolic material refluxes proximal to the catheter tip. Anastomotic vessels not appreciated on angiography can also contribute to nontarget embolization. Nontarget embolization of unintended pelvic vessels is typically well tolerated, secondary to pelvic collateral vessels. In contrast, embolic material introduced into the outflow vessels of the extremity or used during an intervention for the extremity can jeopardize the perfusion of the limb. Endovascular coils, if placed within a proximal segment of vessel, can herniate into the parent vessel, thereby resulting in unintended occlusion distal to the point of herniation. Coils can also embolize through arteriovenous fistulae. The operator must have familiarity with coil retrieval if providing arterial embolization services.

CONCLUSION

Hemorrhage from pelvic fracture is a significant source of mortality in the trauma patient and necessitates a multidisciplinary, algorithm-directed protocol. Angiography and transarterial embolization remain highly effective methods of assessing and controlling arterial hemorrhage. The interventionist should be familiar with clinical presentation, pretreatment imaging, angiographic findings, embolization materials, and potential complications to adequately provide these services.

Luke R. Wilkins, MD, is with the Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System. He has no financial interests related to this article. Dr. Wilkins may be reached at (434) 924-9279; lrw6n@virginia.edu.

Jaime All, MD, is with the Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System. He has no financial interests related to this article.

J. Fritz Angle, MD, is with the Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health System. He has disclosed that he is a consultant for Terumo Medical.

  1. Hoffer EK. Transcatheter embolization in the treatment of hemorrhage in pelvic trauma. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2008;25:281-292.
  2. Suzuki T, Smith WR, Moore EE. Pelvic packing or angiography: competitive or complementary? Injury. 2009;40:343-353.
  3. Cook RE, Keating JF, Gillespie I. The role of angiography in the management of haemorrhage from major fractures of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:178-182.
  4. Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, et al. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients with hemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma. 2002;53:446-450; discussion 450-451.
  5. Smith W, Williams A, Agudelo J, et al. Early predictors of mortality in hemodynamically unstable pelvis fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:31-37.
  6. Starr AJ, Griffin DR, Reinert CM, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: prediction of associated injuries, transfusion requirement, pelvic arteriography, complications, and mortality. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:553-561.
  7. Kos S, Gutzeit A, Hoppe H, et al. Diagnosis and therapy of acute hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013;17:396-406.
  8. Kimbrell BJ, Velmahos GC, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Angiographic embolization for pelvic fractures in older patients. Arch Surg. 2004;139:728-32; discussion 732-733.
  9. Sarin EL, Moore JB, Moore EE, et al. Pelvic fracture pattern does not always predict the need for urgent embolization. J Trauma. 2005;58:973-977.
  10. Katsanos K, Sabharwal T, Carrell T, et al. Peripheral endografts for the treatment of traumatic arterial injuries. Emerg Radiol. 2009;16:175-184.
  11. Doody O, Given MF, Lyon SM. Extremities—indications and techniques for treatment of extremity vascular injuries. Injury. 2008;39:1295-1303.
  12. Bauer JR, Ray CE. Transcatheter arterial embolization in the trauma patient: a review. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2004;21:11-22.
  13. Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, et al. Eastern association for the surgery of trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture—update and systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71:1850-1868.
  14. Biffl WL, Smith WR, Moore EE, et al. Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Ann Surg. 2001;233:843-850.
  15. Agolini SF, Shah K, Jaffe J, et al. Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J Trauma. 1997;43:395-399.
  16. Ben-Menachem Y, Coldwell DM, Young JW, Burgess AR. Hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures: causes, diagnosis, and emergent management. Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:1005-1014.
  17. Fang JF, Shih LY, Wong YC, et al. Repeat transcatheter arterial embolization for the management of pelvic arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2009;66:429-435.
  18. Hagiwara A, Minakawa K, Fukushima H, et al. Predictors of death in patients with life-threatening pelvic hemorrhage after successful transcatheter arterial embolization. J Trauma. 2003;55:696-703.
  19. Jeske HC, Larndorfer R, Krappinger D, et al. Management of hemorrhage in severe pelvic injuries. J Trauma. 2010;68:415-420.
  20. Karadimas EJ, Nicolson T, Kakagia DD, et al. Angiographic embolisation of pelvic ring injuries. Treatment algorithm and review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2011;35:1381-1390.
  21. Frevert S, Dahl B, Lonn L. Update on the roles of angiography and embolisation in pelvic fracture. Injury. 2008;39:1290-1294.
  22. Johnson GE, Sandstrom CK, Kogut MJ, et al. Frequency of external iliac artery branch injury in blunt trauma: improved detection with selective external iliac angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:363-369.
  23. Auerbach AD, Rehman S, Kleiner MT. Selective transcatheter arterial embolization of the internal iliac artery does not cause gluteal necrosis in pelvic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:290-295.
  24. Niola R, Pinto A, Sparano A, et al. Arterial bleeding in pelvic trauma: priorities in angiographic embolization. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2012;41:93-101.
  25. Blackmore CC, Cummings P, Jurkovich GJ, et al. Predicting major hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2006;61:346-352.
  26. Metz CM, Hak DJ, Goulet JA, Williams D. Pelvic fracture patterns and their corresponding angiographic sources of hemorrhage. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004;35:431-437, v.
  27. Mavili E, Donmez H, Ozcan N, Akcali Y. Endovascular treatment of lower limb penetrating arterial traumas. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2007;30:1124-1129.
  28. Yoo DH, Jae HJ, Kim HC, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization of intramuscular active hemorrhage with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012;35:292-298.
  29. Yasumura K, Ikegami K, Kamohara T, Nohara Y. High incidence of ischemic necrosis of the gluteal muscle after transcatheter angiographic embolization for severe pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2005;58:985-990.
  30. Aksoy M, Taviloglu K, Yanar H, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter embolization in arterial injuries of the lower limbs. Acta Radiol. 2005;46:471-475.
  31. Shetty R, Lotun K. Treatment of an iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm with concomitant arteriovenous fistula with percutaneous implantation of an Amplatzer vascular plug. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:E53-57.
  32. Travis T, Monsky WL, London J, et al. Evaluation of short-term and long-term complications after emergent internal iliac artery embolization in patients with pelvic trauma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19:840-847.
  33. Takahira N, Shindo M, Tanaka K, et al. Gluteal muscle necrosis following transcatheter angiographic embolisation for retroperitoneal haemorrhage associated with pelvic fracture. Injury. 2001;32:27-32.
  34. Suzuki T, Kataoka Y, Minehara H, et al. Transcatheter arterial embolization for pelvic fractures may potentially cause a triad of sequela: Gluteal necrosis, rectal necrosis, and lower limb paresis. J Trauma. 2008;65:1547-1550.
  35. Ramirez JI, Velmahos GC, Best CR, et al. Male sexual function after bilateral internal iliac artery embolization for pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2004;56:734-739; discussion 739-41.
  36. Ellison M, Timberlake GA, Kerstein MD. Impotence following pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 1988;28:695-696.
 

Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney
484-581-1816
cmcchesney@bmctoday.com

Stephen Hoerst
484-581-1817
shoerst@bmctoday.com

Charles Philip
484-581-1873
cphillip@bmctoday.com

About Endovascular Today

Endovascular Today is a publication dedicated to bringing you comprehensive coverage of all the latest technology, techniques, and developments in the endovascular field. Our Editorial Advisory Board is composed of the top endovascular specialists, including interventional cardiologists, interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, neurologists, and vascular medicine practitioners, and our publication is read by an audience of more than 22,000 members of the endovascular community.