Advertisement
Advertisement
July 2024 Supplement
Sponsored by The PERT Consortium™
Enhancing Pulmonary Embolism
Treatment: Insights From the APEX-AV Study on the AlphaVac F1885 Catheter
A summary of the study’s findings and their implications on managing patients with acute intermediate-risk PE.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) poses significant challenges in clinical management, necessitating innovative approaches for effective treatment. Endovascular interventions have emerged as promising strategies for selected patients, and the AlphaVac multipurpose mechanical aspiration (MMA) F1885 system (AngioDynamics, Inc.) represents a novel addition to this armamentarium. The APEX-AV study was pivotal in evaluating the safety and efficacy of the AlphaVac MMA F1885 catheter system in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE, shedding light on its potential role in improving patient outcomes.
STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES
The APEX-AV study (NCT05318092), a single-arm, prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption trial, aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of the AlphaVac MMA F1885 system in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. The primary effectiveness endpoint focused on the reduction in right ventricular/left ventricular (RV/LV) ratio within 48 hours postprocedure compared to a predefined performance goal based on literature data. Safety endpoints included major adverse events (MAEs) within 48 hours, with comparisons to established benchmarks. Secondary endpoints encompassed various clinical parameters and outcomes related to safety and effectiveness, providing a comprehensive assessment of the device's performance.
RESULTS
The APEX-AV study enrolled 122 patients across 25 United States clinical sites, meeting inclusion criteria consistent with acute intermediate-risk PE. A significant reduction of 0.45 in RV/LV ratio (the primary effectiveness endpoint) was demonstrated, surpassing the predefined performance goal (P < .001). Additionally, the mean intensive care unit and overall hospital stays were 1.4 and 5.2 days, respectively, indicative of favorable postprocedural recovery. Furthermore, there was a notable 35.5% reduction in clot burden, as measured by the modified Miller Index, within 48 hours postprocedure. Notably, the study revealed a statistically significant decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure pre- to postprocedure (P < .001), particularly notable in patients with pulmonary hypertension.1
In terms of safety, the analysis of the primary endpoint demonstrated a MAE rate of 4.1% within 48 hours, significantly lower than the predefined performance goal (P < .001). MAEs observed were consistent with expectations for the patient population, with no reported deaths during the study period. Noteworthy MAEs included five major bleeding events, one instance of clinical deterioration, and one pulmonary vascular injury.1 These findings underscored the extremely favorable safety profile of the AlphaVac MMA F1885 system in treating acute intermediate-risk PE.
CONCLUSION
The APEX-AV study substantiated the safety and efficacy of the AlphaVac MMA F1885 system in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. By achieving significant reductions in RV/LV ratio and clot burden while demonstrating a favorable safety profile, this endovascular approach presents a minimally invasive alternative for PE management. The volume of clot removed may be superior to competing thrombectomy devices. The study outcomes support the integration of the AlphaVac F1885 catheter into clinical practice, offering potential benefits in improving patient outcomes and enhancing the therapeutic armamentarium for PE treatment.
1. Keeling B. Evaluating the safety and efficacy of the AlphaVac F1885 system in acute intermediate-risk PE patients: APEX-AV trial. Presented at the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) 2024 scientific sessions; May 2-4, 2024; Long Beach, California.
Advertisement
Advertisement